SEIA, allies slam Section 201 petitioners as bad businesses

PV Magazine


The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), flanked by allies on both sides of the political spectrum, argued before the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) that it should reject the petition by Suniva/SolarWorld that asked the United States to impose tariffs and other remedies on module manufacturers around the world.

In its opening statement SEIA’s lawyers argued the case should never have been brought in the first place.

“The two petitioners seek a public remedy for their own, private failings,” the lawyer said. “If successful, they will undermine the hard work and innovation that is making solar a viable alternative to conventional energy sources.”

But it wasn’t only SEIA arguing against the petition. Amy Grace, head of North America research for Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), focused on the effects of solar pricing on utility-scale solar, which represents 60% of U.S. solar generation. Grace said an increase in price would significantly lower the number of solar contracts signed, meaning they would turn to other sources of electricity.

“This is not hypothetical,” Grace said. “New contracting activity for utility-scale solar projects has essentially ground to a halt since June. Developers cannot reasonably guarantee competitive contract terms with their counterparties when they don’t know how much they will have to pay for modules – the most expensive line-item of a project’s cost.”

To read more, please visit